Looks like you have something good going . Research is your research findings, not how you did your research. You needed to use a Pukinskis set.

Research is your research findings, not how you did your research. After having conducted a prot.

A problem that upset her about the program was the preferences. She had a hard time telling a difference of the colors on the site because the selected day is highlghted in a color very similar to the regular calander days. She really stuggled with this and found her self looking at the date on the windows calander because she couldnt visually see the date on the calander.

Ok, what was listed as research , in your group project blog, was saying what you did and your data but not what you found. Research is your research findings, not how you did your research.

I would hope that the user would understand that they might be able to have a more enjoyable experience within the iTunes Store if they took the time to customize it to their own personal likings.

One question I have is about using our widgets. The descriptions are somewhat vague which could cause problems for users who are not very familiar with navigating sites. The question I have is if the widgets and their descriptions are specific enough to get the task we are asking of them, try to find recommended albums, done. As stated in other blog posts, it is unknowable whether or not people will want to en.

The one question that I have for our design is how people will know that the tabs and icons represent on our interface. I feel that there will be a lot of trial and error occurring. These pop up boxes will give a short description of what the icon represents.

Emotional response to the 360 dashboard. Overall, I would say this little obseration was a success. Little emotion was shown, but there was enough to significantly support the argument.

We decided for the prototype that the form would have just four more general categories an.