News, reviews and articles on technology and all that. Mainly focused around Web 2. Tweeting lightweight models and cost effective scalability. Web applications which utilizes this model on scalability would have the capability of implementing and releasing. New products to the market more efficiently and cost effectively without sacrificing the future growth. Furthermore, Twitter follows a unique revenue model with sponsorship adv.

Thanks for dropping by Jaroodi! Take a look around and grab the RSS feed. Does not provide any p.

An exploration of the applications used in our changing world. Users create value; Networks multiply effects; People build connections; and Zynga has taken advantage of all of this. 0, the value of a business in the Web 2. Lightweight Models and the Cost Effective Scalability of Instagram.

Exploring the patterns of web 2. A very interesting video of how our world can evolve with the Internet of things. What do you think? May 14, 2012. LIGHTWEIGHT MODELS AND COST EFFECTIVE SCALABILITY. The strategy of keeping nearly all aspe.

Traditionally, companies required a lot of money, teams of designers, developers, and marketing personnel to get the products or services to the market in a timely fashion. However following the shift in the way we interact with the web, it is now much easier to startup as no longer is there a need for those large teams and there are new, more cost effective ways in which to market. As a direct consequence, where.

Rooster Teeth And Lightweight Models and Cost-Effective Scalability. The last pattern of Web 2. 0 I will be covering is Lightweight Models and Cost-Effective Scalability. This pattern is all about taking advantage of this new ability to get more for less. 0 traditional costs and risks are reduced as, firstly, there is much less up front capital required. This is a direct result of the software. They called the show Red vs Blue. After this video was posted, the traffi.

Web 20 in this pattern. The benefits of this web 2. 0 model are faster development, low risk and cost and good ROI. Firms must have a clear vision to the demand of customer and themselves to decide scale of firm and software. Some cons of the pattern.

Lightweight Models and Cost-Effective Scalability. Because much cost was required to maintain those services or systems. After that, companies realized that creating simple applications could be better for success; they have changed their way of thinking of Doing more with less . Consider syndication rather than coordination. Design for hackability and remixability. On the other hand, its simple architectu.

Do more with less SimpleDigram. All in all, to survive in such a rapidly growth time of web 2. 0 apps, finding new ideas and develop new apps is not enough for achieving success, the continuity revenue strategy and increasing scalability is also very important for newly growing companies.

Open to write and comment! Facebook applying Lightweight Models and Cost Effective Scalability. With advent of Web 2. Lightweight Models and Cost Effective Scalability is the last but not least core pattern of Web 2. 0 that encompasses other Web 2. 0 patterns in one or other way such as Data is the Next Intel Inside.