peopleurs wordpress.com
市區重建策略檢討--草根觀點 Just another WordPress.com weblog
Just another WordPress.com weblog
OVERVIEW
The site peopleurs.wordpress.com presently has a traffic classification of zero (the smaller the more users). We have analyzed thirteen pages within the web site peopleurs.wordpress.com and found thirty-six websites referencing peopleurs.wordpress.com.
Pages Parsed
13Links to this site
36PEOPLEURS.WORDPRESS.COM TRAFFIC
The site peopleurs.wordpress.com is seeing alternating amounts of traffic all through the year.
Date Range
1 week
1 month
3 months
This Year
Last Year
All time
Date Range
All time
This Year
Last Year
Date Range
All time
This Year
Last Year
Last Month
LINKS TO WEBSITE
灣仔h15重建區 不犧牲任何一個人,落實民間參與規劃郁我屋企,問過我先!
Posted by 影行者 under 短片. Posted by 影行者 under 短片. Posted by 影行者 under 短片. 我們要記住利東街, 但, 記住利東街, 即是, 記住利東街的什麼呢? 十月 1, 2011.
市區重建街坊權益須知 H15關注組製作
已發表 三月 8, 2013.
WHAT DOES PEOPLEURS.WORDPRESS.COM LOOK LIKE?
PEOPLEURS.WORDPRESS.COM SERVER
We found that the main root page on peopleurs.wordpress.com took three thousand two hundred and eighty-one milliseconds to download. I detected a SSL certificate, so we consider this site secure.
Load time
3.281 sec
SSL
SECURE
IP
192.0.78.12
BROWSER IMAGE
SERVER SOFTWARE
We discovered that peopleurs.wordpress.com is weilding the nginx os.HTML TITLE
市區重建策略檢討--草根觀點 Just another WordPress.com weblogDESCRIPTION
Just another WordPress.com weblogPARSED CONTENT
The site had the following in the homepage, "要為保留社區網絡定下條件亦即是為市建局留下了 不執行 的 名正言順 的理由 請問什麼叫 切實可行 誰有權定義 定義了後公眾不滿誰會問責." I noticed that the web site stated " 其實, 在欠缺監管與問責,市民無權參與決策的情況下, 舊策略寫得不太差, 卻已無法落實執行,更別說, 新策略寫得倒退了! 十一月 17, 2010." They also stated " 綜合下列義工校對發展局檢討網頁上文字影像紀錄, 與及參與者親身參與的經歷, 我們總結發展局在文字紀錄上的三大不老實. 會有多次有受害街坊聲淚俱下, 或表達受到嚴重的精神困擾, 其他參與者也目擊,但紀錄人員卻只會寫 街坊感到不安之類的字句, 嚴重 扭曲 諮詢會分組討論, 街坊細數各種問題, 市建局或發展局的相關人員, 就發表意見, 但紀錄人員竟紀錄為參與者意見紛紜! 這就不在話下, 曾有參與者表達主持諮詢者處事不公, 這一段連網上錄影也刪去 十月 22, 2010. 協 助 商 舖 經 營 者及商舖業主."ANALYZE MORE BUSINESSES
0.2Sweet about Ashley
Ash a její new CD.